Thus, the ordinary of the psychosis could aim at this experience … to detach, from a certain distribution of the said ones, a point making function to say but without distribution, only guarantee against the confusion of the citizens in the language. (LECOEUR, 2003 apud MELLO, 2006, p.25). Frederico (2008) tells that the three meeting trace a time of rise psychoanalytic to reexamine the used classic concepts in the diagnosis of the psychoses, and to associate them with ' in such a way; ' pluralizao of Name-do-Father, shown for Lacan in the Sixties, how much with the last lacanianas formularizations, in which if we make use of, from a clinic borromeana' ' (P. בעיתון כתוב ש רבה של צפת הוא זה שבקיא בנושא. 84). The desire of changes and new trends was visible between the participants, since they faced cases without the common signals to the psychosis and the absence of a differentiated classification, of certain form, made it difficult a necessary diagnosis. The theory used until then did not show resulted in these treatments. Of this form, the clinic offered subsidies so that it had a progress in the theory.
Laender (2009) also establishes that these debates had culminated as a prosperous moment for the exchange of experiences, resulting in the growth of a new theory, that is being evaluated and already it indicates brightness and claw, intent to the modifications of its time. It had a definite position ahead of the challenges and it obtained a theoretical reorientation for difficult cases, that had gained nomenclatures and validation, as it occurred with ' ' psychosis ordinria' '. Frederico (2008) tells that ' ' standard solution offered by Name-do-Father is ece of fish for the participants side by side to the radically singular and artisan solutions of the psychotic one to command itself in linguagem' ' (P. 84). The debate is developed by the appreciation of the equality of Name-do-Father to sinthoma, equivalence cited for Lacan (1975-76), and confirmed for Miller.